Taming Volatility: A New Perspective on Variance Swaps

© 2015 EPFL
In less than a decade the market for variance swaps, a derivative used as an insurance against volatility in financial and commodity markets, has grown to be worth trillions of dollars. Yet despite the amount of money staked on these contracts, the pricing of variance swaps is still far from perfect. Now new research of Professors Filipovic, Mancini and Gourier provides a powerful new model for pricing variance swaps, and in doing so reveals how these derivatives can be used to help construct and maintain an optimal investment portfolio, depending on the risk profile of the investor.
Volatility is a fact of life in financial markets. The trading prices of assets, such as stocks, vary over time. They move up and down on a daily basis, some more than others. At times, during economic crises or market panics, for example, price moves can fluctuate wildly. For some people actively involved in the financial markets volatility is welcomed as an opportunity to make money, trading the daily ebb and flow of price movements. For others, though, volatility provides unwanted turbulence, making risk harder to assess, return curves harder to predict, and portfolio and wealth management more difficult.
Fortunately, for those who prefer a less volatile world or at least markets where volatility is more predictable, finance's seemingly never ending capacity for innovation has produced a number of solutions. For a start, you can trade volatility using the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index, more commonly known as the VIX. By using a variety of strategies it is possible to speculate on or minimise exposure to volatility in the future. Or you can get even closer to volatility by trading variance swaps.
Volatility exposure
A variance swap is an over-the-counter financial derivative that allows two parties to take a position on volatility. They underpin the VIX index. In effect a variance swap reflects the variation or degree of movement of an underlying asset, whether that is a stock price, currency or commodity, or an interest rate. One party purchases the variance swap contract from a counterparty at a fixed price reflecting the predicted volatility over time. The swap runs for a specific period of time – the term. At the end of this period the actual realised variance over the period is averaged out and converted into a monetary amount, this will either be more than or less than the strike price and the difference is settled between the parties accordingly.
In this way it is possible for a party to protect themselves, to hedge, against a level of volatility over a particular time horizon. It is similar to buying insurance against a specific risk, such as a bad weather event, for example.
While the use of variance swaps may sound fairly straightforward, it is not. One considerable challenge for sellers, for example, is pricing the swaps correctly. And, while there are pricing models available, they do not necessarily factor in variance over time properly. However, recent research by finance academics Damir Filipovic, Loriano Mancini, and Elise Gourier has provided finance professionals with a new tool for assessing the value of variance swaps. The authors have created a new class of model for modelling variance swap rates, and therefore risk. It is a non-linear model that is both practical to use, and that goes beyond existing industry standard models.
In demonstrating its applicability, the authors show how the model accurately reflects the variance swap rates, and thus volatility, for the S&P 500 for the period from January 1996 to January 2010. At any one point in time the model shows the variance swap rate for a maturity of 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The sample time period includes the financial crisis in 2007/8 and, as would be expected, the model shows variance swap rates rising steeply post crisis as the pricing factors in anticipated volatility.
The authors' model enables more realistic pricing of variance swaps, and for any maturity, including those that might not be popularly quoted. You might, for example, have two parties where one wants to buy a 10 month variance swap from the other and the model can be used to work out a reasonable variance swap rate for a 10 month time horizon. Also, given that it is capable of producing future scenarios, the model can be used as a tool to help develop risk management strategies, for a financial institution planning its capital requirements, for example.
Optimal portfolio strategy
Furthermore, and importantly, the variance swap model can be used by those involved in selecting and managing investment portfolios. The authors investigate the challenge of optimal portfolio choice, and the role of variance swaps as a component in an optimal mix of investments. In particular, they look at a portfolio investing in a stock index, a mixture of variance swaps (three month and two-year horizons), index put options, and risk free bonds.
In doing so, their analysis reveals that an optimal portfolio involves adopting a short-long strategy with respect to variance swaps, with weighting depending on the risk profile of the investor. On average the long-term strike price is greater than the realised variance, so shorting the long-term variance swap allows the investor to pocket any difference. At the same time by buying short-term variance swaps the investor partially hedges portfolio losses against imminent volatility in the underlying asset.
Indeed, using the authors' methods investors can optimise the relative weightings of their portfolio dynamically, at any particular time, depending on their risk profile, and the maturity of the various components of their portfolio. As the authors demonstrate over a 14 year period from 1996 to 2010 it is a method that, with the portfolio rebalanced daily, would have outperformed the S&P 500 index over time for a risk tolerant investor. While for a risk-averse investor it would have produced steady wealth growth, avoiding volatility and reducing the risk of significant losses during a market crisis. This during a period when there were two substantial market crashes.