“Quantum Computing is not yet having its ChatGPT moment”

© 2025 EPFL

© 2025 EPFL

Professor Thomas Vidick joined EPFL in late 2024. He works on problems at the interface of quantum information, theoretical computer science and cryptography.

Thomas Vidick first came across quantum mechanics at the Master’s level and thought it was fascinating, “The maths,” he explains, “is very elegant, very simple. It was so exciting to me because it was telling me that if you update your model of the world, of how things work, from classical mechanics to quantum mechanics, then this makes a difference to what you can compute.”

What, many of you may already be asking, is quantum information and how does it relate to computer science and/or cryptography? It’s a good question in this UN declared International Year of Quantum Science and Technology.

To explain, a good start is with quantum mechanics, which is the study of the fundamental properties of matter at the sub-atomic level, or what happens inside cells. We know that at this microscopic level it is possible to encode data, so taking a step further, quantum information research focuses on how to extract that information and use it for communication, including in quantum computing.

This is a field of cutting-edge computer science working to harness the qualities of quantum mechanics to solve problems faster than even the most powerful classical computers, and is predicted to revolutionize modern computation, communication, and cryptography.

Discovering Quantum

Classic computing processes information that is represented in sequences of zeros and ones whereas quantum computing manipulates encoded information in a different way.

“This is because the laws of physics at the infinitely small level - one particle at a time - have a different nature than the classical laws of physics that underpin Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity. The quantum computer tries to leverage the nature of information in very small physical systems in order to improve computation, so it’s not only the way that you compute that has changed, but the way, more fundamentally, that information is represented,” Vidick said.

Complexity theory and entanglement

Head of the Quantum Complexity and Cryptography Laboratory (QCC) in the School of Computer and Communication Sciences (IC) Vidick uses complexity theory as a tool to study problems in quantum computing to gain new perspectives on classical concepts from theoretical computer science.

“In complexity theory we study the kind of intrinsic limits of what can be computed in a model of computations. There are classical computations and there are also what are called randomized computations, where the main question you ask is OK, if I'm allowed to flip coins and make guesses, and I'm not forced to determine the correct answer all the time, but most of the time, can I speed up certain things?” he said. “And that’s a huge field by itself!”

Vidick also works on entanglement which is another fundamental feature of quantum mechanics in which two or more quantum systems or particles can have a shared, correlated state even if they are separated by a large distance. This means that when you make observations of one particle and observations of the other, what you see will be correlated.

“This is interesting philosophically for me because since the foundations of quantum mechanics it’s been very difficult to define. Even though now it’s been defined mathematically, what it means for experiments, correlations and things you can observe can be very confusing,” Vidick said. “In computer science we have our own set of questions. We don’t care about the paradoxes but does entanglement make a difference? Does it change what we can verify? Can we compute with it, communicate with it, do cryptography with it? I’m interested in this for the model itself, not to solve a specific problem.”

Is quantum computing having its ChatGPT moment?

The excitement around quantum computing began in the 1980s based on two key discoveries: the development of the first quantum algorithm and the realization that quantum is not about computing, it’s about the way information is encoded and how that can be leveraged for secure communication. Yet, despite the developments in the field since then, Vidick doesn’t believe quantum computing is yet having its ‘ChatGPT moment’.

“It’s very noisy at the moment but it’s a bit over-hyped, in practice there isn’t a single, interesting problem that has been solved by any of these machines. It’s not to say that I don’t think that they will because there has been very impressive experimental progress, but not yet. I think it will be a decade or so before this happens.”

And, he likens today’s situation in quantum computing to where machine learning was several years ago, when there was a strong theoretical push but not much happening in practice.

“Beyond nice observations we weren’t doing much with machine learning then because we didn’t have large enough computers. Then, suddenly, the machines became sufficiently large and we realized machine learning really is amazing, it is able to do so many things that we had no idea about, that the theory didn’t predict. I think this also stands for quantum computing.”

Pushing quantum information theory forward at EPFL

Vidick’s focus at EPFL will be on complexity theory questions that are attached to what are called many body systems, ones that naturally arise when physicists model certain kinds of experiments or configurations where particles are arranged in a lattice or array. There are forces that act on these particles, such as attraction or repulsion.

“You model this and look at the most stable state of the configuration. It’s something physicists are interested in because if it has the right properties it may lead to some interesting materials like superconductors. I'm interested in it from a complexity theory point of view. What kind of pattern of entanglement are you going to observe? Maybe the entanglement has a local pattern and if it does, can you represent the state of that system mathematically, in an elegant way, such that you can perform computations on it?”

And Vidick is happy to be doing this research at EPFL. Originally from Belgium, he completed his PhD at Berkeley and then held faculty positions in the United States at the California Institute of Technology and in Israel at the Weizmann Institute of Science.

“I’m still finding my way around EPFL but I’m very happy to be here. People are extremely helpful and friendly and my impression after a few months is that the students here are very strong. The region is also definitely very beautiful. We have put the kids on skis and I love biking. I bike from home to EPFL now and it’s great!”


Author: Tanya Petersen

Source: Computer and Communication Sciences | IC

This content is distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0 license. You may freely reproduce the text, videos and images it contains, provided that you indicate the author’s name and place no restrictions on the subsequent use of the content. If you would like to reproduce an illustration that does not contain the CC BY-SA notice, you must obtain approval from the author.